Despite the timing, it is worth revisiting the Swiss-hosted Ukraine peace summit that occurred on June 15-16, particularly focusing on Thailand’s participation. Amidst Thailand’s busy domestic political scene, it was easy to overlook their involvement in the summit.
Thai PBS recently highlighted Thailand’s decision to participate in the pro-Ukraine summit, which excluded Russia, a key player in the conflict, but then opted not to endorse the final communique. Speculation suggests that Thailand’s desire to join the BRICS groupings may have influenced this decision, as they aim to please Russia, the current chair of BRICS. Economic interests also play a significant role in Thailand’s foreign policy agenda under the current civilian-led Srettha Thavisin administration.
This diplomatic maneuver is not new for Thailand, as they have displayed similar behavior at previous international events. However, the current government appears more concerned about Thailand’s international image, which raises questions about the reasoning behind their actions at the Ukraine summit.
Thailand could have avoided potential controversy by not attending the summit, as many other Southeast Asian nations did. Additionally, Thailand’s history of maintaining neutral relationships with different power blocs could have justified their absence. By steering clear of taking sides, Thailand has often avoided unnecessary conflicts.
Thailand’s presence at the summit could be seen as a strategic move to counter criticisms of passive foreign policy and to demonstrate a more proactive stance on international affairs. The choice to disassociate from the communique highlights Thailand’s commitment to protecting its economic interests and rejecting agreements that do not align with their goals.
Looking ahead, Thailand’s foreign policy seems to be evolving towards a more balanced and assertive approach. Thai officials are exploring a “third path,” focusing on mediation and working with all parties to address common security challenges beyond military concerns.
While Thailand’s foreign policy direction may be underestimated currently, its relevance may become more apparent in the future.